Synergy in penicillin, cephalosporin, amphenicols, and aminoglycoside against MDR S. aureus isolated from Camel milk

Abstract This study investigated the synergy testing of penicillin, cephalosporin, amphenicols, and aminoglycoside in the camel milk (n=768 samples), subsequently used for isolation of MDR S. aureus targeting mecA gene. Antibiotic susceptibility of S. aureus showed >90% isolates were sensitive to ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim and resistant against oxacillin, ampicillin, and cefoxitin. Further, 50-85% of the S. aureus were sensitive to gentamicin, oxytetracycline, and chloramphenicol and resistant against cefotaxime, vancomycin, and cefixime. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of cefotaxime, (C) and ampicillin (A) in combination with gentamicin (G) was reduced by 99.34% and 70.46%, respectively, while with chloramphenicol (Ch), reduction was 57.49% and 60%, respectively. In addition, the Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICI) of G+A, Ch+C and Ch+G combinations showed synergy against 80%, 60%, and 30% of MDR S. aureus, respectively. Similarly, C+A and Ch+G displayed indifferent interaction against 70 % and 30% of isolates, respectively, while the later showed additive interaction against 10% of MDR S. aureus. Altogether, our results described effective combination of gentamicin and chloramphenicol with ampicillin and cefotaxime to combat MDR S. aureus

Comparative application of biological and ninhydrin- derivatized spectrophotometric assays in the evaluation and validation of amikacin sulfate injection

Abstract Instrumental techniques are preferred over bioassay methods for antibiotic quantification mainly due to speed and ability to quantify metabolites in biological samples; however, the potency and biological activity of these drugs cannot be assessed. Two methods - agar well diffusion (bio-assay) and spectrophotometric methods were used to evaluate amikacin sulfate injection. Agar plates were inoculated with S. aureus inoculum; zones of inhibition from its susceptibility to amikacin were obtained, while spectrophotometric absorption at 650 nm of ninhydrin- derivatized amikacin in phosphate buffer (pH 8) was measured. Methods performance showed linearity from 1 - 16 µgmL-1 (bioassay, r = 0.9994) and 10-50 µgmL-1 (spectrophotometric, r = 0.9998). Molar absorptivity was 2.595 x 104 Lmol-1cm-1. Limits of detection and quantification were 1.07 and 3.24 µgmL-1 respectively for bioassay method, while corresponding values for spectrophotometric method were 0.98 and 2.97 µg mL-1. Relative standard deviations were ≤ 2.0% for both methods, with recoveries from 95.93 - 100.25%. Amikacin in brands ranged from 97.53 ± 2.68 to 100.84 ± 1.82%, student's t-test was ≤ 2.78 (n = 4) with respect to label claim for both methods. Experimental paired t-test (t = 2.07; n = 4) and F-test (F = 3.94; n = 4) values indicated no significant difference between both methods, hence comparable and can jointly be used in quality control assessment of antibiotics